Última hora IMPORTANTE

Victor Bout condenado a 25 años de prisión Victor Bout condena 25 años prision

Hace más de año y medio dije en Russia Today que las probabilidades de Victor BOUT de salir vivo de la encrucijada era nulas. Que lo iban a extraditar a EEUU, imputar, juzgar y condenar por crímenes que nunca cometió. Con el veredicto del jueves, se prueba que desafortunadamente, tenía razón.

Aún estoy esperando que cuelguen mi entrevista de ayer en RT. Dije cosas muy fuertes, como por ejemplo, hice un llamamiento a Putin para secuestrar a los ciudadanos norteamericanos y miembros del gobierno con vínculos a la industria armamentística y juzgarles en los tribunales rusos.

Un íntimo amigo y uno de los penalistas más importantes de los EEUU, Barry Bachrach que defendió a James Earl Ray (supuesto asesino de Martin Luther King) 20 años después de su condena me puso el siguiente mensaje después de conocer la condena:

“The final act today was anti-climactic. This end was expected. The script was written long before the meeting occurred in the Bangkok Hotel in Thailand. Everyone played their roles to perfection. Misinformation triumphed. Those armed with the truth and those intent on exposing the truth were ignored, shoved aside, and alienated. In the end, Victor stood alone, unprotected. Was that his choice? Or, did everyone play their roles so well that Victor did not realize he would never get justice. Today, was no surprise. The judge had little to no discretion but to impose the sentence handed down. The sentencing guidelines required today’s result. So, what happens from here. Unless, Victor decides to let those who know the truth and those who want to expose the truth into the play and attempt to rewrite it, the final chapter has already been written. The “Merchant of Death” has been sentenced to 25 years. The director is happy with that and will not permit any changes to the cast. They have taken their final bow, and now move on to finish other stories which have been scripted.”

Continúa leyendo »

Compartir/Share

El derecho legal de Irán para atacar a Israel IranIsraelmapa

Si existe alguna duda de dónde están mis simpatías respeto a Irán, quiero que sepáis, que soy el que más apoya el ataque preventivo de Irán contra Israel. Si Israel tiene el derecho de atacar a Irán, matar a sus científicos, amenazar a un país libre, entonces este país con todo el derecho internacional a su favor, tiene el mismo derecho de atacar a Israel.

¡Dale, a por ellos! A propósito, Asia Times es el medio de gran difusión online que mejor cubre y mejor entiende la situación en Asia.

Como existen encuestas en todos los medios de masa sobre todos los temas posibles, a mi también me gustaría hacer una encuesta.

¿Cuanta gente está a favor y en contra de un ataque preventivo de Irán contra el mini estado de Israel?

Daniel Estulin

Iran’s legal right to attack Israel

Source/Fuente Kaveh L Afrasiabi

PALO ALTO, California – After years of living in the shadow of an Israeli military strike, Iran is now openly contemplating the idea of pre-emptive strike, in light of Israel’s preparedness for imminent attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Citing a right to anticipatory self-defense, the Iranian argument is that instead of waiting for its Zionist adversary to make a move, Iran should take the offensive and cripple Israel’s ability to deliver on its threatened assault.

Iran’s plan to initiate a pre-emptive strike on Israel is perfectly legal under customary international law, according to several Tehran political analysts specializing on Iran’s foreign affairs. “Under the UN Charter, Iran has the inherent right of self-defense that in this case translates into the right to respond to the clear and present danger of imminent attack by the state of Israel in clear violation of international law,” says a Tehran University political scientist who spoke to the author on the condition of anonymity.

Continúa leyendo »

Compartir/Share

La pelota sigue creciendo …Vanity Fair y Vlad Teichberg están ahí. Hace casi un año avisaba de que el movimiento 15M estaba teledirigido por intereses financieros desde Wall Street, liderado por un tipo que había instalada su cuartel general en la calle Pez en Madrid.

La revolución del 99% VladTeichberg

Desde entonces, este hombre había aparecido en todos los medios de masa más importantes del mundo, desde la BBC, hasta NBC, la CNN y la revista New Yorker. ¡Ahora le ha tocado a Vanity Fair! A ver si esta vez la gente empiezan de entender cómo funciona el engaño.

¡Llegó la hora de sacar nuestros cerebros a pasear!

Daniel Estulin

Translation: The ball continues to grow … and Vlad Teichberg and Vanity Fair are there. Almost a year ago I warned you that 15-M movement was remote-controlled by financial interests from Wall Street, led by a guy who had installed his headquarters at Calle Pez in Madrid. Since then, this man has appeared in all mass media in the world, from the BBC to NBC, CNN and the New Yorker. Now it’s Vanity Fair time! Let’s see if this time people begin to understand how the deception works. It’s time to get our brains out for a ride!

Revolution Number 99

America was full of angry people in September 2011, when a few hundred citizens decided to make their anger count. V.F.’s oral history of Occupy Wall Street shows how the spark was lit in Zuccotti Park as a disparate, passionate mix of activists, celebrities, and accidental protesters changed the national conversation.

Related slide show: “The Revolution Will Be Graphic-Designed.” By Max Chafkin With additional reporting by Alexandra Beggs, Mark Guiducci, Jaime Lalinde, Elizabeth Nicholas, Rebecca Sacks and Kaitlin Sanders

La revolución del 99% 3c5b352aaeca63023e750890a74ca6b6 PHOTOGRAPH © STEVEN GREAVES/CORBIS.

COMING HOME Occupy Wall Street protesters celebrate being allowed to return to Zuccotti Park after their early-morning eviction on November 15, 2011.

On September 17, several hundred people marched to an empty square in Lower Manhattan—a place so dull that the bankers and construction workers in the neighborhood barely knew it was there—and camped out on the bare concrete. They would be joined, over the next two months, by thousands of supporters, who erected tents, built makeshift institutions—a field hospital, a library, a department of sanitation, a free-cigarette dispensary—and did a fair amount of drumming.

[View with PicLens]

It was easy to infer from the signs protesters carried what the grievances that gave rise to Occupy Wall Street were: an ever widening gap between rich and poor; a perceived failure by President Obama to hold the financial industry accountable for the crisis of 2008; and a sense that money had taken over politics.

The amazing thing about the Occupy Wall Street movement is not that it started—America was full of fed-up people at the end of 2011—but that it worked. With a vague agenda, a nonexistent leadership structure (many of the protesters were anarchists and didn’t believe in leaders at all), and a minuscule budget (as of December, they’d raised roughly $650,000—one-eighth of Tim Pawlenty’s presidential campaign haul), the occupiers in Zuccotti Park nevertheless inspired similar protests in hundreds of cities around the country and the world. What they created was, depending on whom you asked, either the most important protest movement since 1968 or an aimless, unwashed, leftist version of the Tea Party.

Continúa leyendo »

Compartir/Share