En esta edición del programa EPILOGUE, del canal estatal iraní, hablan del libro DINERO Y PODER:  Cómo Goldman Sachs llegó a gobernar el mundo, escrito por William Cohan.

La investigación minuciosa cuenta cómo, con el apoyo de la maquinaria de relaciones públicas más agresiva y sofisticada en el sector financiero, Goldman Sachs ha proyectado una imagen de ser superior a sus competidores -- más inteligente, más colectivo, más ética y más centrada en el cliente.

En realidad, Goldman Sachs es la piedra angular de lo que yo llamo EMPRESA MUNDIAL S.A. Poderes fácticos financieros con mucho más poder que cualquier gobierno en la tierra.

Daniel Estulin

“Money and Power: How Goldman Sachs Came to Rule the World” by William Cohan

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rtlw9ajvxlw

In this edition of the show we discuss the book Money and Power: How Goldman Sachs Came to Rule the World, written by William Cohan.

The book’s behind-the-scenes account shows how, supported by the most aggressive and sophisticated PR machine in the financial industry, Goldman Sachs has continually projected an image of being superior to its competitors -- smarter, more collegial, more ethical, and more client-focused.

But William Cohan also reveals another way of viewing Goldman -- as a secretive money-making machine that has walked an uneasy line between conflict-of-interest and legitimate deal-making for decades.

William Cohan is the first author to chronicle and to interview the leaders of Goldman Sachs since the 2008 crash, and has gained unprecedented access to the firm’s inner circle.

Every living former chief executive of Goldman Sachs has spoken to him, as well as its current chairman and CEO, Lloyd Blankfein. “Money and Power” is a penetrating study yet of these larger-than-life characters and their secretive world: the definitive account of an institution whose public claims of virtue look very much like ruthlessness when exposed to the light of day.

Compartir/Share

¿Podría el imperialismo norteamericano formar parte del plan secreto del Club Bilderberg? ¿Podrían considerarse los banqueros norteamericanos, diplomáticos y miembros del Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores de ser traidores, de haber convertido a Estados Unidos en un mero instrumento para llevar a cabo los objetivos maníacos de Bilderberg? ¿Sigue existiendo Estados Unidos como una nación soberana o ya ha dejado de existir?

Is American imperialism a Bilderberger plot? Are the American bankers, diplomats, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations all traitors, having turned America into merely an instrument to carry out their Bilderberger maniacal aims? Does America as a sovereign nation even exist anymore?

Daniel Estulin

Treacherous Treaties: American Imperialism, World Government and the Bilderbergers

by Prof. John Kozy

“steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world” George Washington, 1796

Is American imperialism a Bilderberger plot? Are the American bankers, diplomats, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations all traitors, having turned America into merely an instrument to carry out their Bilderberger maniacal aims? Does America as a sovereign nation even exist anymore?

Consider the possibility that the Bilderbergers have already bought off the governments of Western Europe, North America, and the remnants of the British Empire that still cling to the Queen’s skirts. If that be true, the only remaining obstacles to a Bilderberger success are the BRICS and the Moslem world. The WTO and promises of free trade and pie in the sky prosperity can be used to subvert the BRICS which leaves the Moslem countries as the last bulwark in defense of free, independent, and sovereign nations. When one realizes just how ironic that is, the realization of just how far the Bilderbergers have already come in advancing their agenda really strikes home.

Sometime during the First World War, the well-meaning but naïve American president, Woodrow Wilson, came up with the idea that every ethnic minority in Eastern Europe was entitled to its own nation, a nation for every ethnicity, and he persuaded the victorious powers to create such nations while writing the peace treaties that ended the war. It was a bad idea.

Before the war, central and Eastern Europe was dominated by Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Russia. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was comprised of more than a dozen ethnic groups. There were Germans (i.e., Austrians), Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Ukrainians, Serbs, Croats, Slavs, Romanians, and more.

When the war ended, several treaties were imposed on the defeated nations, all of which had to give up territory to the victorious powers and a number of newly created nations (Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Czechoslovakia). Several nations were enlarged (Denmark, Russia, Romania, Yugoslavia, and Italy). The Ottoman Empire was dismembered. Turkey lost most of its land in Europe and Arabia was made into a mandate ruled by the British and French, Syria and Lebanon went to France and Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine went to Britain. In the end, all of this up-carving was naught but a gigantic failure, the consequences of which we are still living with today.

The bug in the broth was obvious. People migrate. In the fifty-one years of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, peoples moved within it. All Poles did not stay in the area that became Poland; Serbs did not stay in Serbia; Croats did not stay in Croatia. When the empire was dismembered, peoples of all nationalities were everywhere. Putting them together again in homogenous groups was impossible. Additionally, some of those of German nationality ended up in France, Denmark, Poland, Czechoslovakia and who knows where else.

Realpolitik in Europe in the early twentieth century was characterized by a plethora of treaties. Bismarckian balance of power relationships ruled the day. Nations lined up with each other to oppose other groups of nations to balance another group’s power. The idea was that if the groups were equally strong peace was assured. How wrong they were.

Even after the war these balance of power relationships continued. (In fact, they continue to this day.) So when Germany began to balk at the onerous conditions placed upon it by the Treaty of Paris, it wanted to retake the territory it had lost and reunite the German peoples scattered throughout Eastern Europe. The peace lasted a mere twenty-nine years! Germany easily took back the territory that had been ceded to France. The Austrians, being a Germanic people, willingly allowed Austria to be annexed. Then the Germans went for the Germans in the territory that had been ceded to Czechoslovakia. War was on the horizon because England and France objected to all of this German expansion, but they ultimately acquiesced, drawing a line on any German expansion into Poland by committing their countries to go to war with Germany if Poland were invaded. In essence, they wrote a treaty, believing that this treaty would work to balance their power with Germany’s and thus prevent war. But it was a sham.

Germany, knowing that neither England nor France were prepared to go to war, invaded Poland on September 1, 1939 after signing the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with Russia (the USSR) to keep it from joining England and France. As a result, the English and French made some minor forays into Germany that were easily repulsed, and Germany easily overran Poland. After that, the English were driven from the continent and the French surrendered.

Almost everyone knows this story, so why am I retelling it. Well the story is old news and not important, but no one has analyzed the role of the treaties involved in it.

What effect did the English and French treaty to come to the aid of Poland have? It didn’t prevent the war. Nor did it help Poland which was overrun at least twice and utterly destroyed. The English and French never liberated Poland. The treaty didn’t extinguish Germany’s desire to expand its territory, for shortly after France surrendered, Germans invaded Russia. What did this treaty do? It merely expanded the war.

For the purposes of this paper, it doesn’t matter that that expansion may have been a good thing in the long run. What is most important is the recognition that when the treaty was invoked, it diminished the sovereignties of both England and France.

A nation is sovereign when it alone is responsible for its behavior. A sovereign nation can go to war or not. A sovereign nation makes its own decisions. But neither the British nor the French made the decision to go to war. The decision was made in Berlin. The German decision to invade Poland was also a decision to bring England and France into the war. After agreeing to come to Poland’s aid, the British and French no longer had any say in the matter. It was all up to Germany.

Germany and Italy were in a similar position. They had a mutual assistance treaty with Japan. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the attack brought Germany and Italy into a war with the United States, a war which neither Germany nor Italy wanted at the time. So the treaty with Japan reduced Italian and German sovereignties. The decision to bring them into war with the United States was not made in Berlin or Rome; it was made in Tokyo. That decision was completely up to the Japanese. The Germans and Italians had nothing to do with it.

So the interesting question is, do all treaties reduce the sovereignties of the nations that enter into them? I am certain the answer is yes. Treaties which are entered into in hopes of preventing wars ultimately expand them and nations find themselves fighting wars they never conceived of because an insignificant member of a treaty can somehow start a war that then extends to all of the treaty’s signatories.

In fact, World War I started in exactly that way. The war which killed more than 15 million and wounded more than 20 million was started by the assassination on June 28, 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, by a Yugoslav nationalist. Because of it, Austria went to war with Serbia. Alliances formed over previous decades, brought the major powers into the war within weeks. How many of these nations would have gone to war over that assassination had the treaties not existed? No one will ever know!

None of the nations except Austria had a hand in deciding to go to war. The decision for every nation involved, except perhaps the United States, was made in Vienna. By signing these treaties, each of these nations gave up their sovereignties. They were no longer masters of their own fates.

Since the end of World War II, the United States has insanely fostered treaty making. There are NATO, SEATO, and only Washington knows what else. Any puny nation that is part of any of these treaties can draw not only the United States but all of the other signatories in to a colossal conflagration. Americans like to pretend that they control these treaty-groups. America refers to itself as a “first among equals.” But that expression is an oxymoron. If there is a first, the rest are not equals, and if all are equal, there is no first! How would Americans react if something happened in Bangladesh that drew the United States into a worldwide war? Realpolitik is a receipe for disaster. Why have we not paid attention to the advice of George Washington?

Two European immigrants to America, both Bilderbergers, who speak with heavy European accents and harbor Bismarckian complexes bear much responsibility for this situation, (Bismarck’s balance of power policies brought peace to Germany for a mere 43 years) but they are not alone.

However balance of power treaties are not the only culprits. Trade agreements are just as bad. Look at what the Maastricht Treaty which established the European Union has done to Greece and threatens to do to other European countries. Today’s Quisling Greek government is now little more than a tool of Europe’s more prosperous states. When Greece’s former socialist Prime Minister George Papandreou proposed a popular referendum on the Greek sovereign debt bailout, the European Union scotched it. Now Greece no longer has the power to call an election that the Union objects to. Greece has even lost its democracy.

But the effect of trade agreements is far more extensive than the EU.

“. . . big financial players have another potential weapon in their battle against safety and soundness. This one is more hidden from view and comes from, of all places, the World Trade Organization in Geneva.

Back in the 1990s, when many in Washington — and virtually everyone on Wall Street — embraced the deregulation that helped lead to the recent crisis, a vast majority of W.T.O. nations made varying commitments to what’s called the financial services agreement, which loosens rules governing banks and other such institutions.

Many countries, for instance, said they would not restrict the number of financial services companies in their territories. Many also pledged not to cap the total value of assets or transactions conducted by such companies. These pledges also appear to raise trouble for any country that tries to ban risky financial instruments.

According to the W.T.O., 125 of its 153 member countries have made varying degrees of commitments to the financial services agreement. Now, these pledges could easily be used to undermine new rules intended to make financial systems safer.”

So now, nations may not even have the power to regulate their financial institutions which, in fact, extends to their economies as a whole. The World Trade Organization rules all.

So how did that happen? Well, people have been trying to create a world government for a long time. To do that, nation states must be rendered effete. Consider what David Rockefeller said at a Bilderberg meeting in 1991:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Well given what the “intellectual elite and world bankers” did to the global economy in 2008, do you really want them to rule all? World government, in order to work, requires that ethnic and religious distinctions be expunged. But ethnic characteristics are often physical and the French and the Russians, after their revolutions, tried and failed to extinguish their peoples’ religious beliefs. So how do you believe a new one world government would react to ethnic and religious uprisings world-wide? Would the entire world begin to look like Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and countless parts of Africa? Is such a world surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries”? More importantly, is American imperialism a Bilderberger plot? Are the American bankers, diplomats, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations all traitors, having turned America into merely an instrument to carry out their maniacal aims? Does America as a sovereign nation even exist anymore? Remember what Jefferson says about banks: “banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.”

Consider the possibility that the Bilderbergers have already bought off the governments of Western Europe, North America, and the remnants of the British Empire that still cling to the Queen’s skirts and are now using all of these nations as tools to bring about their goal of imposing a single bankers’ government on its New World Order. If that be true, the only remaining obstacles to a Bilderberger success are the BRICS and the Moslem world. The WTO and promises of free trade and pie in the sky prosperity can be used to subvert the BRICS which leaves the Moslem countries as the last bulwark in defense of free, independent, and sovereign nations. When one realizes just how ironic that is, the realization of just how far the Bilderbergers have already come in advancing their agenda really strikes home.

Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling is long dead, but his soul has multiplied and now inhabits the bodies of greedy merchants and maniacal diplomats and politicians the world over. For the most part, these people hold respected places in society. Shouldn’t they be vilified instead? What has any Rockefeller or Bilderberger done for you or anyone you know?

John Kozy is a retired professor of philosophy and logic who writes on social, political, and economic issues. After serving in the U.S. Army during the Korean War, he spent 20 years as a university professor and another 20 years working as a writer. He has published a textbook in formal logic commercially, in academic journals and a small number of commercial magazines, and has written a number of guest editorials for newspapers. His on-line pieces can be found on http://www.jkozy.com/ and he can be emailed from that site’s homepage.

John Kozy is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by John Kozy

Compartir/Share

Según el diario el Mundo, “El Observatorio Sirio de Derechos Humanos ha informado este miércoles de que un total de 111 civiles sirios fueron asesinados el pasado martes por las fuerzas de seguridad en Kafrueid, en la región de Idlib (al noroeste de Siria).” Ojo con la manipulación de datos. No tengo ni idea si en este caso la información es verosímil, pero viendo los antecedentes de los medios de masa y sus intenciones en Siria, apostaría lo que sea que forma parte del plan de atacar a Siria.

Hemos visto manipulación información parecida en Kosovo en Racak, donde supuestamente las torpas Serbias habian cometido crímenes de Guerra contra población civil. Más tarde, después de la guerra, los famosos crímenes de guerra resultaron de ser una mentira cualquiera por parte del gobierno americano y sus aliados, traficantes de droga como Thaci y KLA.

Siria

Primero, Idlib es una zona clave. Esta situada cerca de la frontera Turca donde el ejército sirio ha perdido el control. Igual que en Benghazi, Libia cuando empezó el levantamiento “espontáneo” contra Gadaffi, Idlib tiene toda la pinta de convertirse en base temporal de los rebeldes para lanzar sus ataques contra el gobierno.

La jugada en Siria es la siguiente. La financiación de los rebeldes y de las manifestaciones viene de Arabia Saudita, a través de Londres con el apoyo no tan sutil de Turquía. El objetivo? Meter a Rusia y China dentro del polvorín que esta a punto de convertirse esta situación. Turquía esta intentando la reconquista de los territorios de Siria que antes formaban parte de Imperio Otoman. Presidente turco Gul acaba de firmar un acuerdo de cooperación militar con los ingleses en Londres. Turquía esta fortaleciéndose con el dinero procedente de Arabia Saudita y Qatar por parte de los mismos tipos que también financian Fundación Qatar que patrocina al FC Barcelona. Es mas que probable que Guardiola esto no lo sabe pero yo, sí.

Todo lo que esta pasando tiene su lógica aplastante. No existe ninguna solución económica a la crisis, así que EL PODER busca soluciones políticas a través de agresión militar tal y como hemos visto en Afganistán, Irak, Libia, etc. Estamos viendo otro ejemplo más que claro de la forma de trabajar de EMPRESA MUNDIAL SA. Los gobiernos centrales han perdido completamente el control que ahora se encuentra en las manos de las grandes empresas con mucho más poder que los gobiernos, tales como Goldman Sachs y compañía por mucho que Rajoy no se entere de nada.

Para terminar, ya que estamos hablando de manipulación de las percepciones. Queréis ver como Google bloquea cientos de miles de paginas donde aparezco?

Aquí tenéis una  captura de pantalla donde aparecen más de 1 millón de páginas con mi nombre en Google. Teclea DANIEL ESTULIN dentro de una hora y el número de paginas va a reducirse drásticamente!

Daniel Estulin

Compartir/Share

Aquí tenéis mi discurso entero en inglés. Algunas de las cosas que tenía pensado decir no pude decirlas por falta de tiempo. Mañana estaré en Barcelona. Sigo con la promo de Tavistock.

Me encantaría leer opiniones de los lectores. ¿Qué os parece el libro?

Buen domingo para todos.

Daniel Estulin

Good morning. My name is Daniel Estulin. I am the author of an international mega best sellers, THE TRUE STORY OF THE BILDERBERG GROUP AND SHADOW MASTERS. Said simply, without mincing words: Unless we act now, together, as people of the planet Earth against the loathsome creatures who are trying to impose the will of the very few on the many, the chain-reaction disintegration of the economies of the trans-Atlantic system are virtually inevitable.

The global financial system –has totally broken down. A chain-reaction collapse of phoney financial assets is underway across the region. The entire Trans-Atlantic system is imploding under the weight of $1 to 2 quadrillion in speculative financial assets, which can never be paid off no matter how many multi-trillion dollar bailouts are imposed by the Obamas, the Blairs and the Camerons of the world. All they can do, and this they are doing, is murder the populations of subject nations with austerity, while vaporizing any semblance of national sovereignty.

But then, this is not new. It has been forecast by American physical economist Lyndon LaRouche quite some time ago.

Furthermore, we are facing a global, thermonuclear World War III. Faced with the demise of their Trans-Atlantic financial system, and seeing how Russia and China are committed to scientific and technological development and how these two superpowers have refused to submit to foreign financial diktats, the Empire is doing what it has always done: instigate war, which today means world war, and most probably thermonuclear world war. Today’s “New Balkans,” is the Middle East cockpit, serving as the triggering mechanism for a global conflict whose main targets are Russia and China.

This is asymmetrical war, in a sense that governments are not running these operations but rather World Company corporations.

Let me give you an example: Italy. Most people do not understand the undeclared war in Italy. On the one hand, you have Monti-Tremonti-Draghi (Bilderberg)/USA/British Empire/the Netherlands/Switzerland vs Berlusconi/Vatican/Russian/Italian Mafias/ Libya before Ghadaffi was removed/Syria/Russia/China and at the same time Russian and Italian Mafias vs Kosovar/Chechen Mafias.

We have been seeing a lot of Monti on the covers of major newspapers and magazines, trying to give this unelected fool legitimacy. Monti is a bastard child of fondi financial interests. Not only is Monti a former EU Commissioner but also an international advisor for Goldman Sachs, one of the biggest corporations on Wall Street, as well as European Chairman of David Rockefeller’s TC and also a leading member of the Bilderberg Group. Monti is a lackey who has been put there to prepare for the next stage of the banker coup, when the Euro crisis will be hijacked to concentrate even more power into the hands of the very people who caused it in the first place. Isn´t that what Van Rompey and Barroso want? More power?

Now, the new President of the European Central Bank is Mario Draghi – former Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs International. The European Central Bank is now being hailed as the entity to “save the Eurozone” by bailing out Italy, France and Spain.

Monti-Goldman Sachs, Bilderberg and TC

Draghi – Goldman Sachs, Bilderberg and TC

The same Goldman Sachs which “prettied up” the Greek statistics, making possible Greece´s entry into the Eurogroup.

New Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos? Is he really there to save Greece from oblivion? Hardly! He is a former vice-President of the ECB, visiting Harvard Professor and ex-senior economist at the Boston Federal Reserve. Do you really expect him to work for the interest for his nation?

Monti, Draghi, Papedemos, Barroso, Van Rompey are lackeys, they are errand boys for the elite.

Starting to notice a pattern?

It´s not about ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, but rather ONE WORLD COMPANY LTD controlled by Synarchy Movement of Empires. Corporations with far more power than any government on the planet. The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.

The Synarchy movement´s aim is essentially to overthrow in every country, where they exist, the parliamentary regimes which are considered insufficiently devoted to the interests of these groups and therefore too difficult to control. Its aim? To produce a form of government by the CEO´s of industry, under which home and foreign policy would be subordinated to international economy.

Greek, Italian and soon to come Spanish bailout of course is a facade of these operations. What they are trying to do is blow up the system by, instead of allowing Greece to reorganise its money system, they are imposing that Greece be used, that the Greek debt be bailed out by Europe. But, that debt is worthless, just like Irish debt is worthless. Just like Italian debt is worthless. Just like Spanish debt is worthless. It´s garbage, it´s monopoly money. So, asking Europe, which is in the throes of a financial meltdown, to absorb an unpayable debt, which these nations can NEVER repay, means you are going to FOR SURE, destroy Europe. And, it is being done on purpose, because nobody, not even Barroso, who is a moron, believes that Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain can be saved.

The strings attached to this bailout will accomplish precisely what the Eurocrats wanted all along, a closer-knit “political union” as Merkel called for recently – a federal superstate at the cost of European nation states surrendering control over their economies to unelected EU dictators like Herman Van Rompuy and his moronic sidekick José Manuel Barroso.

The policy of the EU Commission, the ECB, the IMF and the FED, is to print as much money as necessary in order to further maintain the high risk casino and, at the same time, to impose brutal austerity policies in all countries.

Getting back to Italy for a moment. Those who have written off Berlusconi better remember this: Berlusconi is coming back. The new capitalist in Europe is Russia and not the USA.

In closing, Until we can bring mankind into the Age of Reason, history will be shaped in actuality, not by the wills of masses of humanity, but by the mere handfuls who, for purposes of good or evil, steer the fate of mankind generally as herds of cows are steered to and from the pasture—and, occasionally, also to the slaughter-house.

I will stop now. Thank you.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgzu9FRCw8Y

Compartir/Share

Una de las ruedas de prensas más memorables jamás vista en el Parlamento. Son palabras de Mario Borghezio. Lo que tenemos que decir importa mucho y a mucha gente. Asusta a muchos, sobre todo a la élite. Por ejemplo, ayer, una hora antes PPE convoco una reunión de emergencia entre todos sus miembros. ¿Coincidencia? Seguro que sí! Jajajajajaja El comunicado de nuestra rueda de prensa ha ido a todos los representantes del Parlamento y de todos los partidos políticos. La primera, en junio del año pasado, estaba llena, llenísima. Más de 80 medios de comunicación y la sala llena. Esta vez, los poderes fácticos no querían sorpresas.

Nuestro mensaje, el mío, es demasiado incómodo y totalmente irrefutable. Europa es un cadáver. Ahora lo hemos dejado claro en el Parlamento Europeo. ¡Mirad el vídeo, pasarlo a los demás, ayudadme a llevarlo a todos los rincones del planeta!

(Fotos al final del reportaje)

Daniel Estulin

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLAGC96JyvI

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjaogU0HMP0

Crisis: Who is Pulling the Strings? (Daniel Estulin, European Parliament, 01.DEC.2011)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgzu9FRCw8Y

Descargar --> Comunicado de prensa de Lega Norte a los medios de comunicación italianos (traducción ingles)

COMUNICATO STAMPA -- UE-CRISI.

ESTULIN E BORGHEZIO : “MONTI, UN INSIDER DEI POTERI FORTI”

COMUNICATO STAMPA. L’On. Bizzotto presenta un’interrogazione urgente alla Commissione Europea

Scariga —> “IL FALLIMENTO DELL’EURO E’ ALLE PORTE: LA GERMANIA SCARICA L’UNIONE EUROPEA ED INIZIA A STAMPARE MARCHI IN SVIZZERA”

[View with PicLens]

Compartir/Share