Os dejo con entrevista en un periódico nacional turco sobre Bilderberg. (Inglés)
This is a national Turkish newspaper interview about Bilderberg Group.
Daniel Estulin
Interview with Deniz Ulkutekin, a Turkish journalist from Cumhuriyet Newspaper
Download original interview in Turkish PDF
First of all you seem to be the one best analyzers of Bilderberg group and related subjects. How did your interest for Bilderberg started?
In 1992, a friend from the Russia´s secret service told me about this strange organizations called THE BILDERBERG GROUP while he was eating a steak with potatoes in a Spanish restaurant in downtown Toronto.
What is Bilderberg?
Bilderberg group is not a conspiracy theory. It isn´t a secret society. There is no conspiracy even though a lot of people with their infantile fantasies see it as such. No group of people, and I don’t care how powerful they are, sit around the table in dark room, holding hands, staring at a crystal ball, planning the world´s future. Realistically speaking, Bilderberg is a conspiracy reality. There are many people who go off the deep end and try to make more of the Bilderberg Group than it actually was and is. It was a very important element of the oligarchical structures of the cold war period. And that in and of itself is a pretty significant factor, because what it meant was that it was a vehicle through which, private financier oligarchical interests were able to impose their policies on what is nominally sovereign governments.
Think of Bilderberg as a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology; a medium of bringing together financial institutions which are the world´s most powerful and most predatory financial interests. And at this time, it is that combination which is the worst enemy of humanity.
The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.
There is another aspect of Bilderberg I think we should address. Bilderberges, the CFR, the TC, etc. These are organisations that have operational missions. These are not the seats of power. These are not the organizations that actually meet and deliberate on major policy decisions, issues of war and peace, questions of genocide. These are the conveyor belts. That´s why its a mistake to think that somehow or other you can pinpoint these organizations as the hub of oligarchical power. When you have organizations that have meeting dates, rosters of members, and now in the more modern period have web sites and twitters things like that. The oligarchical principal works on different and higher level, and so they create a multiplicity of front organizations whose job is to radiate out the idea that already has been pre-determined at a much higher and much more exclusive level. These organizations play a role, but they are not at the top of the pyramid by a long shot.
What are the origins of Bilderberg? Is it really established at 12th century?
It is fair to say that they are a continuation of that as long as you recognise that Bilderberg is one of many such organizations that were established in the modern period as a continuation of method of Venice. For example, what´s the whole system of private tax exempt foundations in the USA and Europe? Those are the old Venecian fondi, the private oligarchical funds that are exempted from the kind of taxes that would be paying in the system of sovereign nation states and the funds are deployed to exert control over policy through methods that are not to be direct and obvious to people stuck in a certainty. You have a Bilderberg meeting taking place once a year, beginning in 1954. The first meeting took place at the Bilderberg hotel in the Netherlands. And the host of that conference was Prince Bernhard, the Dutch Royal consort who was a card carrying member of the Nazi apparatus during WWII. He ripped up his Nazi card and his membership in the SS in order to cleanse his image in preparation for becoming part of the Dutch monarchy by marrying his wife. So, this structure, gathered together on an annual basis 100 to 150 people who were selected from governing circles, from finance, from the military establishment, from the media from the countries of Western Europe and North America and they co-mingle with the leading figures in the private, financial oligarchy. And they sat down off the record and decided upon major policies that would be put forward by that collective group of people over the course of the next twelve months. So, in that sense, it fits all of the descriptions of an oligarchical structure, a conspiratorial structure in that they got together to say we are going to do this, we are going to make these changes in the world and we are not going to consult with constituents in governments and populations that are supposed to operate on a completely different basis.
Could we say that Bilderberg’s main agenda is to create a one world totalitarian faschist, demonic goverment? If so should we think that the evnts that turn on the world, like French Revolution, economic crisis or rise of Nazis are planned for the main agenda?
Their main agenda is control. Everything else is a derivative of their plan. Control comes in many forms and shapes and under numerous guises. One of the elements of this control is Synarchy International. The synarchist movement really emerges during the period of the French Revolution, and when you had in the aftermath of the Jacobian terror the first modern fascist movement, that of Napoleon Bonapart. And synarchy was devised as that ideological foundation of the Bonapardist system of fascist dictatorship. And during the course of the 19th century, there was a series of writers who produced massive volumes on synarchist movement. Going into the 20th century, synarchy was sort of the general swamp from which you had the emergence of Italian fascism and German national socialism. And the advantage of synarchist movement is that it was European wide, and so you had synarchist elements in place in France, in Britain, in the low countries, it was much more universal kind of movement, people like Hjalmar Schacht, the people who were behind the whole pan-European movement, Count Kodenhove Kolergui, these were all leading figures within European synarchy in the first half of the 20th century. What you are talking about is how the oligarchy developed the system of modern fascism to contend with the world that had evolved into the nation state systems, and this was their answer to it. Also, there is a very strong synarchist underpining to the Bilderberg group insofar as synarchy really developed this kind of bypolar global permanent war between the Western powers and Russia. Before the Russian revolution, before there was the Soviet Union, synarchy propaganda targeted Russia as a threat and as an enemy. Really, what you are looking at here, was the oligarchy creating structured that were directed immediately against the danger from their standpoint, the spread of the ideas of the American revolution into Eurasia.
In the 19th century, especially in the immediate post Civil war period, you had the American accomplishments with the Hamiltonian system of national banking and credit, the building of the transcontinental railroad became the model on how the United States, spread its influence throughout the Eurasian region. You had major American influence on Bismarch during the period he was in power and established a unified German state. You had American railroad engineers from the core of engineers deeply involved in the building of TransSiberian railroad that was completed at the end of the 20th century.
Similar things, in Japan during the Meiji period, collaboration with Sun Yatsen, so the idea of creating this east-west confrontation line, which was the core concept of the synarchy, and then carried into latter day manifestations of that like the Bilderberg Group, was to make sure there was no prospect for Eurasian integration and development using American system methods.
To summarise, you could say that the synarchy was the first expression of the ideology to destroy and defeat the achievements of the American revolution in Europe.
I think that World Health Organisation and such institutions -which recognised as worldwide officials on their subjects- are also related with Bilderberg group and it’s agenda. If so should be afraid of them manipulating scientific, medical etc.. information due to Bilderberg’s agendas.
The person who was behind the effort to create Bilderberg is prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. If you go back to the fact that Prince Bernhard was selected precisely because of two qualifications: 1) He was a hardcore Nazi and 2) he was married into one of the critical Royal families of Europe. Remember that the transition from the old Venice to the new Venice involved the movement out of the Adriatic region, which was a rather limited geographic domain. It made sense during the latter phases of the Byzantine Empire, but as the centre of the oligarchical financial power shifted to the coasts of Europe, the Netherlands and Britain became the two centres of this.
Bernhard was a critical and appropriate person because he was a hard core Nazi, and he was married into the Dutch Royal family which was one of two seats of power of the new Venetian system. He would later, in the early 1960s, partner the other Royal consort of the Anglo Dutch Venetian system, namely Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, the husband of Queen Elizabeth II, and what did they join forces to establish? They established WWF, they soon after established the 1001 club, the kind of oligarchical funding mechanism. But the whole idea behind WWF and the general concept behind post WWII environmentalism or conservation, and WHO was a revival of nazi eugenics. At the end of WWII, some of the leading early founders of the environmental conservation movement were unabashed by saying that our man Hitler gave the eugenics a bad name. So, we will have to come up with a nicer sounding term, but it is the same old eugenics policy, radical Malthusian genocide. And so they called it conservation. And then, in the early 1960, these two leading oligarchs, who had Nazi proclivities in WWII created a world environmental movement, when they had the kind of a counter culture social base beginning to be built up as a means to create the appearance of a mass social movement when it was simply the oligarchy pushing the same old piece of population genocide. And they are doing exactly the same thing in Africa, reducing the population under the Planned Parenthood banner.
Also there is the esoterix side of this group. Should we relate them with Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones and Masons? What is their effect on group?
Porch brethren are requirement for a secret society to work and many in these organizations, magical and fraternal are unaware of any deeper motivations of the elite leadership of the group. It is when these secret organizations with members in high political office exert their influence towards goals unknown that people should take notice, and action. Mysticism and fellowship are not bad and evil things. They are just like any thing. It is what people do with them…their actions that do ill or good in this world.
Could you make a review of Bilderberg’s 20112 meeting. What surprises do they planned for the rest of the world this year?
Please see my Bilderberg report on this link.
When I look this year’s attendences list I see 5 Turkish people. Prime Minister of Economy Ali Babacan, Businessman Mustafa Koc, Editor of Hurriyet -most popular newspaper of country-, Vodafone CEO Serpil Timuray, Director of Sabancı Universty Fuat Keyman. So we see people from politics, education, press and communication. What do these people have in common to be involved in Bilderberg meetings?
Bilderberg is a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology of interlocked financial, political, economic and industry interests.
We know that Bilderberg group is not so generous to inform media about their meetings. How do you get inside info?
I have developed trusted sources within the group. These are the people who have either attended conferences or have access to Bilderberg reports which are then duly passed on to others who make them available to the general public.
I spread this items of information among my turkish frinds